Product galleryShown with synthetic demo data

See the system, up close.

The rest of the site tells you what JustineAI™ does. This is what it looks like doing it — captured from the working product, with a synthetic demonstration matter (no client information). One reasoning core, six editions: Personal Injury is in market and shown here; each other edition’s gallery follows as it ships.

Personal Injury — in market
The War Room

Both sides of the case, before the other side.

pi.justinegrid.ai
The War Room — Your Case (liability, Strong, traced to a fact on the record) versus The Other Side (defense attack on causation, High), with Justine’s reasoned work and a settlement range.
Justine traces your case theory to the record — each element linked to a fact on file — and, right beside it, simulates the defense and the adjuster: the attacks, the weak points, the posture. A settlement range, and authorities checked against CourtListener. You read the counter-argument before you’re in the room.
The demand-letter pipeline

Watch the demand letter reason itself into existence.

pi.justinegrid.ai
The demand-letter generation pipeline reasoning in the open — Dossier Assembly and Case Analysis complete with grounded notes (“a strong liability case with minimal apparent comparative fault”), Legal Strategy actively mapping statutes to facts, with Narrative Construction and Composition queued.
Justine drafts as a multi-pass agent — assembling the dossier, analyzing liability, building the legal strategy, constructing the narrative — each pass reasoning in the open and grounded in the record before a word of prose is written. You watch the thinking, not a spinner.
Drafted, then stress-tested

Every letter survives the other side before it reaches you.

pi.justinegrid.ai
A streaming demand letter beside a four-layer quality-assurance panel — Validation, Strategic Review, Auto-Revision, Red Team — with grounded checks: economic-damages math ($10,725 + $18,500 = $29,225) and treatment-gap consistency across sections.
As the letter composes, a four-layer quality pass runs live: validation of the damages math, chronology, and internal consistency; a senior-attorney strategic review; targeted auto-revision; and a red team that plays the defense adjuster. The draft you open has already been through the gauntlet.
Ask Justine

Ask a question. Watch her reason, and cite.

pi.justinegrid.ai
Ask Justine answering a statute-of-limitations and liability question with grounded reasoning.
Justine plans, reasons, and calls grounded legal tools — statute-of-limitations, valuation, medical chronology, citation verification — then answers in the matter’s own context. You steer; you attest.
Grounded, or it says so

She reasons from the record — and tells you when it’s silent.

pi.justinegrid.ai
Justine declining to assess treatment gaps because the record contains no evidence of them.
Asked about treatment gaps the file doesn’t document, Justine says so plainly instead of inventing them: “without evidence of treatment gaps, there is no basis to assess their impact.” No hallucinated facts, no invented case law.
The matter workspace

One matter. One reasoning context.

pi.justinegrid.ai
The matter workspace with essentials, stage workflow, and reasoning panels.
Intake through settlement in a single, matter-centric workspace — essentials, stage workflow, evidence, valuation, and Justine’s reasoning, all in one place.
The medical ledger

Every provider, every visit, every code.

pi.justinegrid.ai
The medical-records ledger — emergency, orthopedic, and physical-therapy providers, each with ICD-10 diagnoses, per-visit CPT codes, and billed / paid / balance / lien tracking.
Each treating provider with its ICD-10 diagnoses and per-visit CPT lines — billed, paid, balance, liens, and authorization status. The specials that drive settlement value, organized the way an adjuster reads them.
Valuation & case strength

A number — and the reasoning behind it.

pi.justinegrid.ai
Case valuation and strength — an AI-calculated settlement range ($50,000–$80,000, medium confidence) and a 76% case-strength score with a grounded analysis of liability, the cervical injury, the statute of limitations, verified specials, and the treatment gap.
An AI-calculated settlement range and a case-strength score, each grounded in the record and the governing law: liability, the cervical injury, the verified medical specials, the statute of limitations, and the treatment-gap risk the defense will raise. Justine reasons over the matter — and shows her work — rather than guessing.
The dashboard

Your practice, read overnight.

pi.justinegrid.ai
The dashboard with case pipeline, AI insights, and Justine’s autonomous activity.
Justine works the caseload continuously — a daily review that flags the treatment gaps, deadlines, and risks that move a matter, so you start the day on the case that matters.
The caseload

The whole portfolio, at a glance.

pi.justinegrid.ai
The case list with stage, strength, priority, and deadlines per matter.
Every matter with its stage, case-strength read, priority, value, and next deadline — the firm’s book of business in one view.
More editions on the way

The same reasoning core, calibrated to each practice. Each edition’s gallery populates when the edition ships — we don’t show a screenshot of a system that isn’t live yet.

Screenshots reflect the live product on a synthetic demonstration matter; individual features vary by edition and plan.