An agentic Digital Employee for personal-injury law.
JustineAI™ PI is the Agentic Legal Operating System for personal-injury firms. Justine plans, reasons over the whole case file, calls real legal tools, and cites her sources — across every matter, client, deadline, and trust dollar. Watch her think, verify her work, and decide.
She reasons; you decide. One platform, one price, unlimited demands.
14-day free trial · No credit card required · Cancel anytime
A true tool-calling agent. Not a chat box.
Justine is an autonomous Digital Employee. She plans, reasons, calls the firm’s tools, and produces cited work product across every matter — powered by the Eve-Fusion compound reasoning model. The attorney reviews and decides; Justine does the work between the decisions.
- 01 · Plans
She breaks the work down.
Given a matter or a firm-wide question, Justine plans the steps — which records to read, which authorities to check, which figures to compute — before she starts.
- 02 · Reasons
She thinks it through — in view.
Powered by the Eve-Fusion compound reasoning model, Justine reasons over the whole case file in one context — chronology, medicals, coverage, statute — and streams her thinking as she goes.
- 03 · Calls tools
She uses the tools of the firm.
She calls the real tools she needs — document analyzers, citation verification against CourtListener, valuation and settlement math, the trust ledger, the deadline engine — and reads the results back into her reasoning.
- 04 · Cites & acts
She produces cited work product.
She drafts the demand letter, assembles the filing packet, prepares the disbursement statement, and answers with the source behind every claim — for the attorney to review and decide.
Twelve real legal tools.
These aren’t canned answers. Justine invokes the same tools your firm relies on, against your own data, and reads the results back into her reasoning before she answers.
- Statute of limitations
Computes the deterministic SOL clock for the matter.
- Case valuation
Models special, general, and net figures against comparables.
- Medical chronology
Builds an incident-anchored treatment timeline.
- Analyze medicals
Reads each record for causation, gaps, and expenses.
- Verify citation
Confirms case law against CourtListener — fail-closed.
- Conflict check
Screens parties across the firm before engagement.
- Firm-wide deadlines
Surfaces every upcoming deadline across the book.
- Portfolio summary
Rolls up matter status and risk across the firm.
- Financial summary
Reads trust balances and matter economics.
- Find client
Locates a client across every matter they touch.
- Search matters
Queries the whole book of business by any signal.
- Search case documents
Semantic RAG retrieval — ask a question, get the answer from the matter’s own records and filings, with the source.
- Ask Justine, firm-wide — she plans, then answers across every matter with verified citations
- The War Room — gathers a matter’s record and synthesizes chronology, medicals, valuation, and statute
- Auto-drafts verified demand letters end to end
- Analyzes medical records and deposition transcripts and reports what it finds
Ask her anything. Watch her reason to the answer.
Ask Justine works on one matter or across the whole book of business — no case need be open. She plans, calls the firm’s real tools, reasons over what they return, and answers with the source behind every claim. Pick a question and press play.
“What needs me this month across the whole firm — deadlines and any trust shortfall?”
- Plan
Two questions in one. I’ll pull every upcoming deadline across the book, then reconcile each matter’s trust balance and flag anything short.
- Calls tool
firm-wide upcoming deadlines()
Scanned every open matter — 4 deadlines fall inside 30 days; one is a statute-of-limitations date.
- Calls tool
statute of limitations()
Confirmed the Ramirez SOL runs in 19 days — deterministic, statute-cited.
- Calls tool
financial summary()
Read trust balances across matters and ran three-way reconciliation on each.
- Reasons
The Ramirez SOL is the hard one — it gates the filing packet. One trust ledger reconciles clean to the penny; another is missing a recorded lien payoff, so it will not tie out until that entry posts.
- Cites
Four deadlines in 30 days — Ramirez SOL in 19 days is the priority. Trust reconciles across matters except Okafor, where a $4,200 lien disbursement is un-posted; I flagged the ledger entry. Every figure links to its matter and ledger line for your review.
Illustrative of the work Justine surfaces on a real file. Every answer is attorney-reviewed work product; nothing leaves without your sign-off.
See both sides of the case before the other side does.
The War Room is a dual-perspective view of the matter. Justine builds your case theory — every liability element and damages figure traced to a source in the record — and, right beside it, simulates the other side: the defense and adjuster’s likely attacks, the weak points they’ll press, and the posture they’ll take. It reasons only from the record on file: every element carries a citation, authorities are checked against CourtListener, and nothing is invented. You read the counter-argument before you’re in the room.
Justine builds the case theory from the record.
- Each liability element, traced to a source fact in the file
- Damages by category, with the figures behind them
- Case-theory strength, element by element
- Supporting authorities, verified against CourtListener
She argues the defense and the adjuster against you, so you hear it here first.
- The attack the defense will make on each element
- The weak points they will press
- The adjuster’s likely posture and opening move
- Where your record is thin — before they find it
Plus a settlement band — low, expected, and high, with the likely first offer and the reasoning behind each number — and every authority in the build is independently re-verified against CourtListener before it stands. Reasoned from the record on file; it is analysis to inform your judgment, not a prediction or a guarantee of outcome.
A score you can see her reason to.
Justine scores a matter’s strength from 0 to 100 and models a settlement valuation — and she shows the factors behind both. It is analysis to inform your judgment, reasoned only from the record on file. Not a prediction, not a guarantee.
Viability score for Ramirez v. Delgado — surfaced in the 06:00 briefing with the full reasoning trail.
- Liability is cleanRear-end collision; the defendant admitted fault in his Day-1 recorded statement.
- Causation is documentedThree treating records tie the L4–L5 herniation back to the collision.
- Damages are supportedSpecial damages of $87K with venue comparables running $180K–$320K.
- One gap to explainA 19-day treatment gap the carrier’s IME will press — rebutted by two PT notes.
- The clock is shortStatute of limitations runs in 21 days; the filing packet is gated on it.
The settlement band.
Low, expected, and high — each number reasoned from the record, with the likely first offer and the logic behind it laid out for your review.
- Low
$180K
if liability is contested and the gap sticks
- Expected
$215K
bottom-line authority on the current record
- High
$320K
top of the venue comparable range
Illustrative of a single matter. Settlement analysis is reasoned from the record on file to inform your judgment — it is not a prediction or a guarantee of outcome.
The reason you can put an agent on a matter.
Agentic AI only belongs in a legal file if it refuses to make things up. Justine is built to ground every claim, drop what she can’t verify, and tell you when she doesn’t know — so the record stays sound and the judgment stays yours.
- 01 · Fail-closed citations
She won’t call a citation good law unless it’s confirmed.
Every authority Justine relies on is checked against CourtListener before she stands behind it. If a citation can’t be confirmed, she drops it rather than assert it. This is the anti-hallucination guarantee — the discipline that lets you put AI in a legal file.
- Citation verification runs fail-closed — unconfirmed means unused
- No invented case law, no invented reporter cites
- The authority behind every argument is traceable and checkable
- 02 · Document intelligence — “Justine’s Read”
She reads every record and refuses to guess.
Justine reads each medical and liability document and builds an incident-anchored treatment chronology. When a record is undated, she drops it rather than guess where it belongs — so the timeline you rely on is the timeline the record actually supports.
- Incident-anchored treatment chronology across every provider
- Undated records are set aside, never placed on a guess
- Causation links, treatment gaps, and expenses surfaced for review
- 03 · Jurisdiction-aware reasoning
California by the book. Elsewhere, she flags — she doesn’t guess.
Justine reasons directly under California’s verified law. For other jurisdictions she flags the state-specific rules that need your confirmation and refuses to guess at law she can’t verify — so a cross-border matter never gets silently mis-reasoned.
- California rules reasoned directly, statute-cited
- Out-of-state rules flagged for attorney confirmation
- No guessing at unverified jurisdictional law
- 04 · Document-grounded answers
Answers over your firm’s own documents — with an honest “not found.”
Ask about the record and Justine answers over your firm’s own documents, with inline citations to the source. When the documents don’t support an answer, she says so rather than filling the gap. Every query runs under hard tenant isolation — your files, only your files.
- Inline citations to the source document on every grounded answer
- Honest “not found” when the record doesn’t support it
- Hard multi-tenant isolation — one firm’s data never touches another’s
- 05 · Autonomous, overnight
A nightly case auditor and a morning briefing that’s already done.
The daily AI case auditor sweeps every open matter overnight — treatment gaps, missed deadlines, stale providers. By 06:00 the AI morning briefing has a prioritized start-of-day read waiting: what changed, what needs you, and what’s due.
- Nightly autonomous sweep of every open matter
- Prioritized morning briefing / rounds at the start of the day
- Deadlines, gaps, and risks surfaced before they become problems
This is the reasoning — not just the workflow.
The case-reasoning quality that used to be locked inside elite firms, on every matter. These are the kinds of findings Justine surfaces on a real file — the contradictions, the comparables, the deadlines a busy practice would miss — each one presented with its evidence, its confidence, and the source behind it, for your review.
- Intake reasoning
Justine found — Drop the police report, the ER intake form, and the carrier’s declaration page. Justine reads every page, extracts the jurisdiction, the at-fault carrier, and the layered UM/UIM coverage — and shows the source page behind every value, with a validator council confirming the statute clock before assembly.
- Medical chronology
Justine found — Across 5,000 pages and nine providers: the 19-day treatment gap the carrier’s IME will exploit, the two PT notes that contradict its functional-capacity opinion, and the three records that establish causation back to the collision.
- Case valuation
Justine found — Special damages $87K. Venue comparables for an L4-L5 disc herniation in San Diego County run $180K–$320K. Lien total $42K against a $100K policy plus $250K UM. Pre-suit demand: $385K. Bottom-line authority: $215K.
- Deposition analysis
Justine found — Cross-referenced the defendant’s Day-3 deposition against his Day-1 recorded statement and the police report — three inconsistencies on speed and following distance, and a ready cross-examination sequence built from his own prior words.
- Negotiation strategy
Justine found — When the demand leads with future-medical and a sworn provider affidavit, this adjuster’s own claim history shows a markedly higher rate of settling soft-tissue cases under policy limit. Justine framed the opening number 15% above the projected acceptance range — with the supporting authority already attached.
- Viability + deadlines
Justine found — Scored the matter 85/100 — citing both treating physicians, a clean liability picture, and a statute-of-limitations deadline 21 days out — and surfaced it in the 06:00 briefing alongside the two other matters that need you today.
- Conflict + citation discipline
Justine found — Caught a prior representation of the opposing driver before the engagement letter went out. And every statute and case Justine cites is grounded against a verifiable authority on CourtListener — reasoned from real law, never invented.
The AI reasons; the attorney decides.
Powered by Eve-Fusion — a compound reasoning model.
Justine reasons on Eve-Legal F5/reasoner, JustineAI’s configuration of the Eve-Fusion™ compound reasoning model — grounded, jurisdiction-aware, and read across the entire case file in one context. It is a composition of cooperating models, not a single one — and we never name a third-party foundation model on a customer surface.
Reasoning tiers.
Firms are provisioned on a reasoning tier that scales deliberation depth to the work — from Economy to Maximum. It’s an enterprise configuration set with your team, not a dial in the sidebar.
- 01 · Economy
High-volume, routine work — fast and cost-efficient.
- 02 · Balanced
The everyday default for most matters.
- 03 · Performance
Deeper reasoning for contested, high-stakes files.
- 04 · Maximum
The fullest deliberation, for the matters that warrant it.
Three things your firm already pays for. Replaced by one.
Most PI firms pay for three things — a case manager, an AI layer bolted on top, and a demand vendor that bills $275–$800 per letter. JustineAI™ PI replaces all three, with AI bundled — not metered — and demands unlimited.
A case manager
Headcount that tracks matters, deadlines, records, and trust — one seat at a time.
An AI layer, bolted on
A separate tool stitched on top, usually metered by usage or by seat.
A demand vendor
Outsourced demand writing that bills $275–$800 per letter — per matter, every time.
JustineAI™ PI is one Digital Employee across the whole firm — case management, medical-record and deposition analysis, verified demand letters, IOLTA-grade trust accounting, and California deadline automation. AI is bundled into the seat price. Demand letters are unlimited. One platform, one price.
34 capabilities. One seat.
The full feature set a personal-injury firm runs on — the agentic work, the reasoning, the demands, the trust dollars, the deadlines, and the operational spine — in one platform, at one price. Every item below is shipped in the PI edition today.
Agentic AI
A Digital Employee that plans, reasons, and acts across the firm.
- Firm-wide agentic Ask Justine
- The War Room — matter gather + synthesis
- Autonomous multi-step tool use
- Attorney-in-the-loop review on every action
Advanced reasoning
Powered by the Eve-Fusion compound reasoning model.
- Case strategy & assessment
- Case strength / viability scoring
- Settlement valuation reasoning
- Jurisdiction-aware, California-grounded reasoning
Demands & analysis
The document work, bundled — not billed per letter.
- Unlimited demand-letter generation
- Medical-record analysis
- Deposition analysis
- Ask over your documents (semantic RAG, cited)
- Verified legal citations (CourtListener)
Documents & drafting
Author, review, sign, and send — in one place.
- Multi-pass demand drafting + generation history
- Attorney-review workflow (submit → revise)
- In-app e-signature (ESIGN / UETA)
- Send via Outlook · import/export (M365, Dropbox)
Intake & clients
From first call to open matter, structured.
- AI client intake chat (public, empathetic)
- AI attorney intake copilot
- Firm-branded public intake portal + inbox
- Leads CRM, conflict check, client email
- Client SMS with attorney-alert privacy relay
PI money
Trust dollars, handled to the ledger line.
- IOLTA trust accounting
- 3-way reconciliation
- Settlement disbursement statements (gross → net, PDF)
Deadlines & signing
The clock and the paperwork, automated.
- California rules-based docketing
- Statute-cited deadline automation
- In-app e-signature (ESIGN / UETA)
- E-filing packet preparation
Run the practice
The operational spine of the firm.
- Conflict checks
- Client intake portal
- Time tracking
- Reporting & analytics
- Secure multi-tenant isolation
See the full capability catalog →
On the roadmap, not yet live — direct court e-filing submission (Justine prepares the packet today), fax, phone-intake / telephony, Filevine integration, a client case-portal (the firm-branded public intake portal is live and distinct from it), single sign-on, and bank auto-feed for trust reconciliation. The turnkey approved integrations today are Microsoft 365 and Dropbox; DocuSign is available as a bring-your-own connection (connect your own account to view envelopes). We label roadmap items as roadmap; they are never presented as shipped.
The client hears from the firm — in their language.
Justine keeps the client informed by text and email, with a number-privacy relay so attorney alerts never expose a personal cell number — every message attorney-reviewed before it goes out.
- Client texting with a privacy relay
Opt-in, STOP-compliant SMS keeps the client updated on their case, and attorney alerts route through a number-privacy relay so the client never sees a personal cell number. Transmitted over Azure Communication Services on a toll-free line.
- Per-case client email
Real client messages threaded to the matter, sent through Microsoft 365 / Outlook — the correspondence lives with the file, not in a separate inbox.
Not legal advice · not a law firm · ABA-conduct aligned · the attorney decides. Client communications are attorney-reviewed work product.
Priced per seat. AI included.
AI is bundled into every seat — never metered. Demand letters are unlimited at every tier. Every plan starts with a 14-day free trial, no credit card. Annual billing saves roughly two months.
- Justine Core
$129 / mo
per support seat / month
$109/mo billed annually
For the support staff who keep matters, records, and deadlines moving.
- Ask Justine across every matter
- Case management, intake, and time tracking
- Medical-record and deposition analysis
- AI bundled — never metered
- 14-day free trial, no credit card
- Justine ProfessionalMost popular
$349 / mo
per attorney seat / month
$290/mo billed annually · $3,490 / yr
The flagship seat for attorneys running personal-injury matters end to end.
- Everything in Justine Core
- Unlimited verified demand letters
- IOLTA-grade trust accounting + 3-way reconciliation
- Disbursement statements (gross → net, PDF)
- California deadline automation + e-signature
- Justine Firm
Custom
enterprise · custom
For firms that need custom terms, isolation guarantees, and single sign-on.
- Everything in Justine Professional
- Custom MSA + DPA
- Dedicated tenant isolation + customer-managed keys
- Single sign-on (SAML / Microsoft Entra ID)
- Compliance evidence package + named contact
14-day free trial on every plan · No credit card required · Cancel anytime · Annual billing saves roughly two months.
Questions, answered honestly.
Is JustineAI™ PI a chatbot?
No. Justine is a Digital Employee — an autonomous agent that plans, reasons over the case file, calls the firm’s tools, and produces work product across every matter. A chat box answers a question; Justine does the work, under the attorney’s supervision.
Will the AI make up case citations?
No. Every authority Justine relies on is verified against CourtListener, and she will not assert case law she cannot confirm. Verification is fail-closed — if a citation can’t be confirmed, she drops it rather than assert it. The reasoning is grounded in the record and in verifiable law — no hallucinated citations. As with any work product, the attorney reviews before it goes out.
Can I ask Justine about the whole firm, or just one file?
Both. Ask Justine works on a single matter and firm-wide — with no case open — across every matter, client, deadline, and trust dollar. She’s a true tool-calling agent: she plans, calls real tools like firm-wide deadlines, portfolio and financial summaries, and find-a-client-across-matters, then answers with the source behind each result.
Will Justine answer from our own documents?
Yes. Ask about the record and Justine answers over your firm’s own documents with inline citations to the source. When the documents don’t support an answer, she says “not found” rather than filling the gap. Every query runs under hard multi-tenant isolation — your files, only your files.
What about matters outside California?
Justine reasons directly under California’s verified law today. For other jurisdictions she flags the state-specific rules that need your confirmation and refuses to guess at law she can’t verify — so a cross-border matter is never silently mis-reasoned. Additional jurisdictions are on the roadmap.
Is the e-signature DocuSign?
No. E-signature is native and in-app — ESIGN / UETA compliant, with a hash-chained audit trail and a Certificate of Completion. It is not a third-party vendor and does not email signers; your firm distributes the signing links. Firms already standardized on DocuSign can connect their own DocuSign account (bring-your-own integration key) to view their existing envelopes, but native e-signature remains the default.
Can we control how deeply Justine reasons?
Yes — at the firm level. Firms are provisioned on a reasoning tier, from Economy to Maximum, that scales deliberation depth to the work. It’s an enterprise configuration set with your team during onboarding, not a dial in the sidebar.
Are demand letters really unlimited?
Yes. Demand-letter generation is bundled into the seat price — not billed per letter. Generate as many as your matters need. A multi-pass pipeline drafts and flags QA issues for your review; the attorney finalizes. Medical-record analysis and deposition analysis are bundled the same way.
Can Justine e-file directly with the court?
Not yet. Today Justine prepares the complete e-filing packet, ready to submit. Direct court e-filing submission is on the roadmap. In-app e-signature (ESIGN / UETA, with an audit certificate) is live now.
What jurisdiction does it cover?
California today. The rules-based deadline automation and demand workflow are California-grounded and statute-cited. Additional jurisdictions are on the roadmap.
How is our firm’s data secured?
JustineAI™ PI is multi-tenant with row-level isolation, so each firm’s data is scoped to that firm. It runs keyless on managed identity — no shared secrets — and it does not log prompts or client PII.
Are you SOC 2 certified?
SOC 2 is in progress. We do not claim a certification we do not yet hold. The platform runs on Microsoft Azure, which carries its own attestations at the infrastructure layer; our own report is being pursued and we will say so plainly when it is complete.
Put one Digital Employee to work across your whole firm.
JustineAI™ PI is live for personal-injury practices in California. Start a 14-day free trial — no credit card. AI is bundled, demands are unlimited, and Justine is working matters on day one.
14-day free trial · No credit card required · Cancel anytime
JustineAI™ PI is legal-workflow software, is not a law firm, and its outputs are not legal advice.