JustineAIWC · In market · Eve-Legal {F5/reasoner}

JustineAI™ — Workers’ Comp Edition

Win more comp cases. Miss nothing.

Applicant-side workers’ comp, built to real depth in California, Georgia, and Texas — each with its own statutes, its own benefit math, and its own deadline traps. Justine reads the AME / PQME record, computes the California permanent-disability rating to the official schedule with the statute cited, computes Georgia and Texas benefits from the evaluator’s impairment rating, tracks the state-specific deadlines that decide a case, and — when more than one state could have jurisdiction — tells you which forum governs. Bilingual EN/ES client letters and voice. The attorney reviews and decides.

WC runs on the full Eve-Legal Operating System — case management, deadlines, conflict check, trust accounting, time tracking, the firm-branded public intake portal, and Microsoft 365 · Dropbox integrations. The OS layer is shared across every edition; the legal-reasoning calibration is what changes. In-app e-signature is built and not yet reachable, so it is on the roadmap rather than in that list.

14-day free trial · No credit card required · Assisted onboarding

Not legal advice · not a law firm · ABA-conduct aligned · the attorney decides. Every output is attorney-attested work product.

Justine — the JustineAI™ WC Digital Employee
Workers’ comp attorneyIn market
The overnight sweep

It worked the book while nobody was asking.

wc.justinegrid.ai
The daily briefing — a banner reading “You’re covered”, reporting that Justine watched eight open matters overnight, that seven need attention today and that no jurisdictional deadlines are at risk, above a list of matters ranked by urgency.
The background agents run the whole book on a shared queue — reconsideration, IMR, objection, QME and SOL windows — and hand you a ranked list of what needs a decision. They can queue outward-facing work. They can never send it.

Captured from the working product on a synthetic demonstration matter (Vasquez, ADJ4998217). No client information. Figures shown are outputs of that demo matter, not customer results.

ProofEach one is checkable

Four things you can go and verify.

  • Every statutory clock is tracked, not sampled.

    Reconsideration, IMR, objection, QME and SOL windows across the whole book — with drafts prepared on the matters that need action, rather than a report of what already lapsed.

    The WC catalogue

  • The rating is computed both ways.

    Strict AMA with the QME’s apportionment, and again with the apportionment challenged — both rating strings shown, the difference quantified, and every figure flagged for verification against the current schedule.

    How it works

  • An unverifiable citation is reported, not smoothed over.

    Authorities are checked against CourtListener and the ones that do not resolve are named in the working log, where you can see them.

    How verification works

  • Three states, applicant-side, and that is the whole of it.

    California, Georgia and Texas today. Other states, and defense-side practice, are roadmap rather than available — we would rather you learned that here than on a call.

    The edition roster

Citation discipline

The interesting part is the one it could not verify.

wc.justinegrid.ai
Ask Justine scoped to one matter, showing her working checklist: searching the case documents, then verifying three citations against CourtListener — two verified, and one reported as could not verify — with the authorities she relied on listed beneath.
Justine checks every authority against CourtListener and reports the ones that do not resolve by name, rather than letting an unverifiable citation soften into a footnote. The list of authorities actually relied on sits under the answer.

Captured from the working product on a synthetic demonstration matter (Vasquez, ADJ4998217). No client information. Figures shown are outputs of that demo matter, not customer results.

The Value Engine

The rating, computed both ways, with the reasoning attached.

wc.justinegrid.ai
A California permanent-disability rating computed two ways on a synthetic cumulative-trauma matter — as reported under strict AMA with the QME’s apportionment, against the same rating with apportionment struck — with both rating strings shown and a value-at-stake line, each figure carrying a verify-against-current-schedule caveat.
Justine rates the QME at face value and again with the apportionment challenged, shows both rating strings, and quantifies what is actually at stake between them — flagging every figure for verification against the current schedule rather than presenting it as settled.

Captured from the working product on a synthetic demonstration matter (Vasquez, ADJ4998217). No client information. Figures shown are outputs of that demo matter, not customer results.

Who it’s for

Applicant-side practices in three states.

Workers’ comp is a deadline business before it is a reasoning business. The edition is calibrated to the statutes, the official forms, the benefit arithmetic and the objection windows that an applicant-side practice actually runs on.

  • Applicant-side firms

    Statutory clocks tracked across the whole book, with drafts ready on the matters that need action rather than a list of what you already missed.

  • Rating and settlement work

    Permanent-disability ratings computed both ways, the apportionment argument laid out, and the settlement posture — C&R against Stips — costed to net-to-client.

  • Spanish-speaking caseloads

    Client updates drafted bilingually in English and Spanish, in plain language, for your review before anything is sent.

In market applicant-side in California, Georgia and Texas. Coverage beyond those three states is roadmap, not available today.

PricePublished, per seat

The same seat rates as PI.

Priced by who sits in the seat, not by matter volume or by edition. AI is bundled and never metered, and the tier you buy under changes onboarding, support and contract language — never what Justine will do on a file.

  • Justine Core

    $129

    per support seat / month

    $109 billed annually

  • Justine Professional

    $349

    per attorney seat / month

    $290 billed annually · $3,490 / yr

  • Justine Firm

    Custom

    talk to us for terms

What each tier includes, and what it does not →

14 days free · no credit card · assisted onboarding

Start today

Run your WC practice on Justine.

WC is in market for applicant-side workers’ comp in California, Georgia, and Texas. Request a 14-day trial, or talk to us about your firm. Every rating, apportionment, and settlement figure is a projection for the attorney to verify against the current schedule and CMS thresholds.

14-day free trial · No credit card required · Assisted onboarding. Not legal advice · not a law firm · ABA-conduct aligned · the attorney decides.